论文部分内容阅读
文章中的整体性评估框架是以描述和测度数字不平等现象为目标而提出的,这一框架的提出背景是现有的数字不平等理论在基本假设和经验研究方面均存在漏洞,基于特定数字不平等形态的研究在客观上背离了个人信息实践的本质特征;其经验数据来自于对甘皖津三个地区九个村庄中农村居民的田野调查。文章提出了针对数字不平等类型的新划分方法与整体性评估框架,分析了该框架内的情境投入、数字化能力产出、数字化效率等概念之间的关系。在具体的数字化不平等评估层面,文章提出了数字化效率函数,并基于函数推导阐释了初期资源投入增加与数字化不平等持续加深这一矛盾所包含的内在必然性,同时也分析了该评估方法对未来研究的可能贡献。
The holistic assessment framework in the article is aiming to describe and measure the phenomenon of digital inequality. The background of this framework is that the existing theory of digital inequality is flawed in basic assumptions and empirical studies. Based on the specific figures The study of inequality objectively deviates from the essential characteristics of personal information practice. Its empirical data come from the fieldwork of rural residents in nine villages in three districts of Gan, Wan and Jin. This paper proposes a new classification method and overall evaluation framework for the types of digital inequality, and analyzes the relationship between the concepts of contextual input, digital capabilities and output, and digital efficiency within this framework. In the aspect of specific digital inequality assessment, the article proposes the digitized efficiency function and deduces and illustrates the inherent inevitability of the contradiction between the increase of initial resource investment and the deepening of digital inequality based on the function deduction. Meanwhile, this paper also analyzes the impact of this assessment method on the future Possible contribution of research.