论文部分内容阅读
误区一:拣好场所查。以时间紧、任务重等为借口,把“全面性的普查”变通为“选择性的抽查”,而被抽查的场所大都是上下同心协力、经过精心“包装”过的“好”地方, 以至于尽管被查的单位安全工作漏洞百出,也可能是“安全生产优秀单位”,误导部分职工弄虚作假。误区二:拣好职工查。有的基层单位, 为了在安全检查中能够顺利“过关”、能够赢得上级的表彰、嘉奖,从职工中挑选部分文化程度高、操作能力强的职工组建“迎检队”,安全检查时,由“迎检队”成员顶岗,其他职工一律临时“下岗”,误导部分职工认
Misunderstanding one: pick a good place to check. Totally time-consuming, heavy tasks and other excuses to change the “comprehensive survey” to “selective spot checks,” and most of the spot-checks are made from top to bottom, hand-crafted, well-crafted packaging, As for the safety of units under investigation, there are still many loopholes in the safety work and may be “good units for safety production”, misleading some workers to make mistakes. Misunderstanding two: picking good workers check. Some grass-roots units, in order to successfully carry out the “clearance” during security inspection, can win the recognition and awards of their superiors. When selecting some of the employees who are highly-educated and capable of operation, they form a “greeting team” and conduct security checks. Members of the “Welcome Team” are on top of posts and all other workers are temporarily “laid off”, misleading some employees