论文部分内容阅读
卡冈《艺术形态学》自1986年译为中文本出版后(由三联书店出版,属中国社会科学院文学研究所王春元、钱中文主编现代外国文艺理论译丛),在艺术学界曾引起学习浪潮,学者或采用其艺术结构系统中的系统结构分析,或看到了功能系统分析,却忽视了其系统论中历史方面的精华(音乐与音乐文学涉及)。这使得艺术形态学的研究流于艺术分类学或艺术类型学,其艺术发生学方面的意义往往遮蔽不见。再者,卡冈采用系统论历史方面之逻辑与历史的研究方法,缜密地推演艺术世界之建构,某种程度上可为梳理中国古典艺术体式文献提供参照视角。在借鉴的同时,也应注意中西方在把握“历史”时的关照角度不同。本文采用文献阅读法与综述法见出艺术形态学系统论中历史方面的重要性,以期用他山之石以攻玉。
Kaga’s Art Morphology was translated into Chinese since its publication in 1986 (published by Joint Publishing, a collection of modern foreign literary theories compiled by the Institute of Literature of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and edited by Qian Zhongwen), which has caused a wave of study in art circles. Scholars either adopt the structural analysis of the system in their art structure system or see the analysis of the functional system but neglect the essence of history in their systematic theory (music and music literature). This makes the study of artistic morphology flow to art taxonomy or art typology, whose artistic genesis often fails to obscure its meaning. In addition, Kaga uses the systematic and historical research methods of logic and history to carefully deduce the construction of the world of art. To some extent, Kaga can provide a reference perspective for combing classical Chinese literature. At the same time, we should also pay attention to the differences in the perspectives of care between China and the West in grasping “history ”. This article uses the method of literature reading and review to find out the importance of history in the theory of the system of artistic morphology in order to use the stone of other hills to attack the jade.