论文部分内容阅读
关于褶曲(包括弯曲褶曲)的术语含混不清的原因之一,可以认为尽管形态上的分类与定义同成因上的分类与定义不一定总是一一对应,但人们却把这两者混淆使用。例如,木村(1973)把弯曲褶曲当作单一的板或者构造上单一的层弯曲时形成的褶曲,即看作为一种挠曲褶曲(Donath和Parker,1964),而且,由于天然褶曲的成因不明,主张,不论纵弯褶曲,还是横弯曲褶曲均称为弯曲褶曲。 鲁宾逊把由部位不同而强度不一的垂直力作用下形成的袖曲叫做弯曲褶曲(bending fold)。希尔斯(1953)则认为,弯曲褶曲在纵弯曲褶曲中虽没
One of the reasons for the vagueness of the term flexion (including tortuous flexion) suggests that although morphological classification and definition do not always correspond one-to-one with the genetic classifications and definitions, one confuses the two . For example, Kimura (1973) considered curved folds as single plates or as folds formed when a single layer was bent, that is, as a flexing fold (Donath and Parker, 1964), and because the origin of natural folds is unknown , Claim that, regardless of vertical bending folds, or horizontal bending folds are called bending folds. Robinson refers to the bending fold, which is formed by the action of vertical forces of different intensities. Hills (1953) argues that bending folds are not in longitudinal bending folds