论文部分内容阅读
案例:小军和小青是某学校初三年级的同班同学,二人因有早恋行为被学校发现,校方通知了家长来“领人”。双方家长来到学校,希望学校能给孩子一个改过的机会,但校方的态度始终很坚决,认为小军和小青违反了学校的管理制度,要将他们开除。小军父亲为此感到很困惑:“学校就是孩子接受教育的地方,怎么出了点事就要开除,那么谁来教育孩子呢?”分析:《中华人民共和国教育法》相关法条规定:学校及其他教
Case: Xiao Jun and Xiao Qing are the same classmates in the third grade of a school. Two of them were found by the school because of their puppy love behavior. The school informed the parents of “collar”. Both parents came to the school and hoped that the school would give the children a chance to change their minds. However, the attitude of the school was always very firm. They believed that the army and Xiaoqing violated the school’s management system and were to be dismissed. Small army father was very confused for this: “school is the place where the child is educated, how to get out of something, then who will educate their children?” Analysis: “People’s Republic of China Education Law,” the relevant provisions of the law : School and other teaching