论文部分内容阅读
本章讨论的概念和许多有组织的、准组织的人类活动是有关系的。在学术术语上,它们属于美学、政治哲学和社会哲学、宗教哲学的范畴。人们对如何正确使用这些概念是存在歧异的,比如:艺术、民主、基督教教义等概念。当我们考察这些术语的不同用法和特色观点时,会发现没有一种用法是被普遍接受的。不同的用法有助于不同学派功能的发挥,也有助于不同政治团体、政党、宗教社区功能的发挥。一旦多个功能解释开来,围绕上述概念的争论可就此结束。事实情况并非如此。
The concepts discussed in this chapter are related to many organized and quasi-organized human activities. In academic terms, they belong to the category of aesthetics, political philosophy and social philosophy, religious philosophy. People have different opinions on how to use these concepts correctly, such as the concepts of art, democracy and Christian doctrine. When we examine the different usages and distinctive points of these terms, we find that no usage is universally accepted. Different usages contribute to the function of different schools and contribute to the function of different political groups, political parties and religious communities. As soon as multiple functions have been explained, the debate surrounding the above concept can end. The fact is not the case.