论文部分内容阅读
目的初步探讨观察对象有关问题,并与疑似职业病病人进行比较分析,以期能够准确地把握观察对象有关问题,减少实际工作中的争议。方法依据现行的职业卫生法律法规,结合工作实践进行探讨。结果观察对象与疑似职业病病人都不属于法定职业病,两者在确定时间、持续的状态、健康损害与所从事职业病危害因素的关系、确定主体和途径以及依法报告等5个方面存在不同。结论建议正确运用观察对象,进行观察对象的法定报告工作,在进行标准修订时,根据实际情况删除标准中不适合的观察对象及有关内容,进一步理顺职业病诊断工作。
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the related issues of observation objects and compare them with suspected patients with occupational diseases so as to accurately grasp the relevant issues of observation objects and reduce the disputes in practical work. Methods According to the current occupational health laws and regulations, combined with work practice to explore. Results Both the observation object and the suspected occupational diseases were not statutory occupational diseases. There were differences between the observation objects and the suspected occupational diseases in determining the time, the continuous state, the relationship between the health damage and the occupational hazards involved, the determination of the subject and the way and the legally reported. Conclusion It is suggested that the observation object should be correctly used and the statutory report of the observation object should be carried out. During the revision of the standard, the inappropriate observers and related contents in the standard should be deleted according to the actual situation to further rationalize the diagnosis of occupational diseases.