论文部分内容阅读
研究的目的:比较RU486/Cytotec药物和负压吸宫术两种流产方法的效果,以及医学的和个人的可接受性.对象为通过咨询,介绍两种流产方法后,让对象自愿选择而组成.年龄在20～34岁.药物组100例,闭经35～42天,第1天口服RU486 600mg,第3天服Cytotec(PGE1)0.4mg,第17、43天回医院随访.手术组100例,闭经≤56天,负压吸宫术后第14、43天回医院随访.结果:完全流产率药物组为89%,手术组为100%.对象选择这两种流产方法的主要原因:药物组94%的人认为痛苦少,手术组的55%认为手术快、节省时间,而且手术同时可取出或放置宫内节育器(占45%).结论:RU486/Cytotec药物流产和负压吸宫术在各自适合的人群中都具有高度的可接受性.两种方法各具优缺点,不能相互取代,二者相辅相成,取长补短,将使终止妊娠的措施更为安全
The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of two abortions with RU486 / Cytotec and vacuum aspiration, as well as medical and personal acceptability, for the purpose of counseling and introducing two abortions and allowing subjects to voluntarily choose Aged from 20 to 34 years.Among them, 100 cases were in the drug group and amenorrhoea 35-42 days.On the 1st day RU486 600 mg, Cytotec 0.4 mg on the 3rd day, and back to the hospital on the 1st, , Amenorrhea ≤ 56 days, suction back to the hospital after 14 days and 43 days after suction suction.Results: The rate of complete abortion was 89% in the drug group and 100% in the operation group.Objects The main reasons for choosing these two abortion methods: drug 94% of the group considered the pain less, and 55% of the operation group thought the surgery was quick and time-saving, and the IUD could be removed or placed in the operation (45%). Conclusion: RU486 / Cytotec abortion and suction Surgery in their respective populations have a high degree of acceptability of the two methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, can not replace each other, complement each other, complement each other, will make termination of pregnancy measures more secure