论文部分内容阅读
一、“尴尬”由来近几年笔者在做龙岩市中考数学试题评价时总感慨:中考数学成绩两极分化非常严重,及格率始终徘徊在60%左右,低分段(总分150分,低于60分)人数比例越来越大。如2012年全市60分以下占比19.5%;2013年全市60分以下占比23.2%;2014年全市60分以下占比24.7%。面对如此庞大的数学学习“弱势”群体,笔者时常思考:是命题时难度把握出了问题还是初中数学教学存在问题?假如中考试题难度再降一些,成绩分布是否会理想些呢?今年暑期,笔者邀了几位一线初中数学教师(含个别参与命题的教师)对照课标和“考试大纲”的要求,逐一对这几年的中考数学试题进行对比研
First, “embarrassment ” origin In recent years, the author is doing Longyan City, senior high school entrance examination math test evaluation always feeling: high school entrance examination math results polarization is very serious, the passing rate is always hovering around 60%, low segment (score 150 points, Less than 60 points) the proportion of people is getting bigger and bigger. For example, in 2012, the city accounted for 19.5% below 60 points; in 2013, the city accounted for 23.2% below 60 points; in 2014, the city accounted for 24.7% below 60 points. Faced with such a large number of math learning “vulnerable ” groups, the author often think: is difficult to grasp the problem proposition or junior high school mathematics teaching problems? If the difficulty of the exam and then drop some, the distribution of the results will be ideal? Summer, the author invited a number of front-line junior high school mathematics teachers (including individual teachers involved in the proposition) control the standard and “test syllabus ” requirements, one by one in the past few years of the entrance exam math test comparison