论文部分内容阅读
问:现在对史学作品的可读性问题议论很多,其实历史学并非生就是一副古板的面孔,古代的许多历史学家同时又是文学家,如两司马笔下的历史文章中就有对话、细节描写,非常生动,读来引人入胜。但后来的一些史学作品则有了越来越多的八股味,似乎主要表现在选题单调空泛,可读性差;语言缺乏个性,没有激情。您认为其主要原因是什么?当前要弘杨民族文化,振兴历史科学,对此应如何改进?其实,当代的一些马克思主义历史学家也具有优良的学风和文风,叙事深入浅出,文笔简洁流畅。比如您的文章就具有这样的特点,您能否再评述一些您所了解的历史学
Q: Nowadays, there are many discussions on the readability of historical works. In fact, historiography is not an old-fashioned face. Many ancient historians are also writers at the same time. For instance, there are dialogues in the historical articles by Sima, Details, very vivid, fascinating to read. Later, however, some historical works have more and more eight-masculine flavor, which seems to be mainly manifested in the omission of monotonous topics, poor readability; language lacks individuality and there is no passion. What do you think is the main reason for this? At present, we must promote Yang ethnic culture and rejuvenate the history science, and how should we improve it? In fact, some contemporary Marxist historians also have excellent style of study and style of writing. For example, your article has such characteristics, can you comment on some of your understanding of history