论文部分内容阅读
《湖南教育》1985年10期刊登的《“以上”“以下”辨析)一文,对“60分以上含60分本身,80分以下不含80分本身”这种观点,提出了不同看法。认为,既然80分以下不含80分,那么60分以上也不应含60分。否则就犯了“偷换概念、自相矛盾”的错误。这种观点,我以为是作者没有全面地考察“以上”、“以下”这两个概念的含义所致。我们在解释一个词的含义时,不仅要注意释义的
In “Hunan Education” published in the 10th issue of 1985, “above and below” “discussion” article, on the “60 points above 60 points itself, 80 points below does not include 80 points itself” this point of view, put forward different views. Since 80 points or less do not include 80 points, 60 points or more should not contain 60 points. Otherwise, they made the mistake of “stealing concepts and contradicting each other.” This point of view, I think it is due to the author did not comprehensively examine the meaning of the “above”, “below” the two concepts. When we explain the meaning of a word, we must not only pay attention to the meaning of