论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨腹式子宫切除术与阴式子宫切除术的临床治疗效果。方法对亳州市人民医院2010年8月至2012年8月之间收住的40例开腹子宫切除术(对照组)和40例阴式子宫切除术(观察组)治疗情况进行对比分析,观察两组的手术操作情况和术后的恢复情况。结果本研究中观察组患者无中转开腹情况。观察组的患者手术时间、术中出血量和住院时间以及排气时间均明显低于对照组,两组数据比较具有显著差异(P<0.05);观察组患者术后镇痛率明显的高于对照组情况(P<0.05)。结论阴式子宫切除术和腹式子宫切除术均具有较好的临床效果,而阴式子宫切除术治疗中能够有效的缩短患者的治疗时间和减少术中出血量,腹部无疤痕,并且具有较好的镇痛效果,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy. Methods 40 cases of open hysterectomy (control group) and 40 cases of vaginal hysterectomy (observation group) admitted to Bozhou People’s Hospital between August 2010 and August 2012 were compared and observed Two groups of surgical operation and postoperative recovery. Results In this study, there was no transit laparotomy in observation group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time and exhaust time in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, with significant differences between the two groups (P <0.05). The postoperative analgesia rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group Control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy have good clinical results, and vaginal hysterectomy in patients with treatment can effectively shorten the treatment time and reduce intraoperative bleeding, abdomen without scar, and have more Good analgesic effect, it is worth clinical application.