论文部分内容阅读
目前,好新闻照片的评价标准问题在新闻摄影界争来争去,尚无定论。冠以全国性或权威性的影赛为数不少,但难得听到大家的一致认可。即便是在国际上获了奖的,亦未见同仁们有“备受鼓舞”的表现。公理婆理,各有各理,谁也不服谁。一些业内人士对现行的评选方式很不以为然,有的甚至提出“那些自以为是的评选到底说明什么”? 我曾经问一位以往对我国新闻摄影十分关注、现在却敬而远之的读者对上述现象的看法,他的回答只两个字:厌倦。我一再追问,他颇尖锐地说,你们各个成了理家辩家,谁都有一套,可就是报纸上
At present, the issue of the evaluation criteria for good news photos is controversial in the photojournalism community. There is no conclusion yet. Crowned nationwide or authoritative video games a large number, but it is rare to hear everyone’s unanimous approval. Even those who have won prizes in the world have not seen their colleagues “encouraged”. Justice-law, have their own reason, who also refused to accept who. Some people in the industry disagree with the current assessment methods, and some even put forward “what those self-righteous judgments are exactly explaining?” I once asked a reader who has been very concerned about news photography in our country and is now at arm’s length, The answer is only two words: tired. I have repeatedly asked him, he said quite sharply, each of you became a defender of science, who have a set, but the newspaper