论文部分内容阅读
最近学术界再次展开了关于“劳动创造人”问题的讨论。(见《自然辩证法通讯》1981年第1、5期)人类起源问题是一个重要的基本理论问题,它既是古人类学研究的主要课题,也涉及社会科学、自然辩证法和哲学研究中的一些普遍性的问题。因此,对“劳动创造人”问题提出重新探讨,无疑具有重要的意义。一种新的看法多年以来,学术界广泛流行的一种看法是,劳动在从猿到人转变过程中起了主要的、决定性的作用,劳动使古猿变成了人,并且认为这是恩格斯提出来的马克思主义的人类起源理论。笔者过去也曾持有类似的看法。最近讨论中,有人提出一种新的看法,认为“劳动创造人的观点是恩格斯的一个基本观点。但恩格斯劳动创造人的理论是很不完善的理论,存在许多逻辑矛盾,自然科学的发展也否定了这个理论的自然科学根
Recently, the academic circles started the discussion on the issue of “labor creation man” again. (See Diagrams of Dialectics of Nature, No. 1, 1981, No. 1, 1981) The issue of the origin of mankind is an important basic theoretical issue. It is not only a major issue in the study of paleo-anthropology, but also involves some universals in social sciences, dialectics of nature, and philosophical studies Sexual issues. Therefore, it is undoubtedly of great significance to put forward a new probe into the issue of “labor creation”. A New Perspective For many years, one widely held view in academia was that labor played a major and decisive role in the transition from ape to man, that labor turned the ape into human beings and that this was Engels Proposed Marxist Theory of Human Origin. I have held a similar view in the past. In the recent discussion, some people put forward a new view that "the view of labor-maker is a basic view of Engels, but Engels’s theory of labor-creation is a very imperfect theory with many logical contradictions. The development of natural sciences Negated the natural sciences of this theory