论文部分内容阅读
第三届《戏剧报》梅花奖开始评选时,我在给编辑部的一封信中提出了一个意见,就是建议评选时不必拘泥于限定的名额,而应该好中选好,根据条件能评上几个算几个,以保持住梅花奖的水平和威望。没想到我的这个意见,还真受到了梅花奖评选办公室和评委会的重视。从报纸上已经公布的评选结果看,这届梅花奖话剧演员就没有选满既定的五个名额,而只选出了四个,空缺了一名。空额一名,意义很大。这说明评委会认真维护梅花奖声誉,不凑数,不降格,
When the third “Drama Newspaper” Plum Blossom Prize began to be voted on, I put forward a comment in a letter to the editorial department that I would suggest that you do not have to stick to a limited quota when selecting a contest. Instead, you should make a selection based on the conditions Count a few in order to maintain the plum prize level and prestige. I did not expect this opinion, really received the plum prize selection office and the jury’s attention. Judging from the results already published in the newspapers, the Plum Blossom Drama performer did not fill up the five places already established, but only four of them were selected and one was vacant. An empty amount of great significance. This shows that the jury earnestly uphold the plum reputation, not to mention the number, not dropping the grid,