论文部分内容阅读
以高本汉为代表的传统学者对《切韵》音系的构拟,主要是参照现代方言及域外借音等材料,为《切韵》所分的音类寻找合适的音值。这种构拟方法没有考虑音值的分布情况和系统性,导致构拟出的音系过于复杂。20世纪下半叶以来,学者认识到音位构拟的必要性,从不同学术背景出发对《切韵》元音系统做了不同程度的音位化构拟。文章尝试对各家构拟《切韵》元音音位系统的方法和结论进行概括综述,并对各家构拟的得失进行讨论。
The traditional scholars represented by Gao Han, such as Modern Chinese Dialects and Foreign Borrowing Tone, are trying to find a suitable sound value for the “Qie Yun” class of phonetic system. The proposed method does not take into account the distribution and systematicness of the sound values, resulting in a too complicated sound system. Since the second half of the 20th century, scholars have realized the necessity of phonetic transcription and have made phoneticizations of “Qieyun” vowel systems to different extents from different academic backgrounds. The article attempts to summarize the methods and conclusions of each system of constructing the “cut rhyme” vowel phoneme system, and discuss the pros and cons of each system.