论文部分内容阅读
1990年4月,个体运输户王文书向袁维靖借款4000元,双方约定借款利率为月息二分五厘。至1993年5月,王文书分几次归还袁维靖利息3700元,本金300元。仍欠袁本金3700元,一直未归还。1993年11月4日,袁维靖以王文书欠其借款未还为由,将王正在营运的一辆价值3万余元的货车强行扣押。后经双方多次协商未果,货车一直被扣,造成该车损坏及部分零件丢失。无奈,王文书于1997年2月向河南省民权县人民法院起诉,要求袁返还汽车,赔偿汽车损坏及零件丢失造成的经济损失。民权县人民法院经过审理认为:被告袁维靖扣押原告王文书的货车属非法行为,但起因系原告未还清借款引起,故双方都有责任。
In April 1990, Wang Wenshu, an individual transporter, borrowed 4,000 yuan from Yuan Weijing and both parties agreed that the loan interest rate should be two-tenths and one-fifth of the monthly interest rate. To May 1993, Wang Wenshu several times to repay the interest Yuan Weijing 3700 yuan, 300 yuan principal. Still owe yuan principal 3700 yuan, has not been returned. On November 4, 1993, Yuan Weijing forced the seizure of a truck worth over 30,000 yuan that Wang was operating on the grounds that Wang Wenshu owed his loan. After several unsuccessful negotiations by both parties, the truck has been detained, resulting in damage to the car and the loss of some parts. Helpless, Wang Wenshu prosecuted People's Court of Civil Rights County of Henan Province in February 1997, asking Yuan to return the car and compensate for the economic losses caused by the automobile damage and the missing parts. Civil rights County People's Court after trial that: the defendant Yuan Wei Jing seized the plaintiff Wang Wenshu the truck is illegal, but the cause of the plaintiff did not pay off the loan, it is the responsibility of both parties.