论文部分内容阅读
当前,我国经济合同法中有关经济合同无效的规定过于宽泛,加之司法实践中职权主义思想的影响,导致无效经济合同泛滥。对这一现象,法律界的有识之士提出过很多补充和完善的建议,集中表现在提议以“契约自由”、“合同自治”等理论对经济合同法中的规定进行定位原则的修正。那么,在经济合同法修改之前,如何有效地遏制无效经济合同泛滥这一现象呢?在此,笔者尝试从民事诉讼法所确认的处分原则出发,论述在诉讼过程中,让当事人获得经济合同效力问题的相对处分权的必要性。希望这一探讨能对无效经济合同的确认的司法实践提供某些启示。
At present, the provisions on the ineffectiveness of economic contracts in our country's economic contract law are too broad, and the influence of the power doctrine in judicial practice leads to the proliferation of invalid economic contracts. To this phenomenon, many people of insight in the legal field have put forward many suggestions of supplementing and perfecting. They focus on proposing the revision of the principle of positioning the provisions in the economic contract law with the theories of “freedom of contract” and “contract autonomy”. So, before the amendment of the economic contract law, how to effectively curb the proliferation of invalid economic contracts phenomenon? Here, the author attempts to proceed from the principle of disposition recognized by the Civil Procedure Law and discusses the effectiveness of the parties in economic litigation during litigation Necessity of the issue of relative sanctions. Hope this discussion can provide some enlightenment for the confirmation of judicial practice of invalid economic contract.