论文部分内容阅读
几年来,《近代史研究》编辑部十分重视对中国近代史研究的评论工作,把学术评论的重点放在涉及学风和学科建设等重大问题上,以此加大学术评论工作的力度。 1.关注重大的理论方法问题 20世纪80年代以来,海外史学以及其他社会科学理论和方法涌入中国,极大地开阔了人们的视野。同时,两种倾向在滋生蔓延:其一在方法上不求甚解、不加批判地生吞活剥、生搬硬套外来的理论方法和概念,在文风上诰屈聱牙、概念堆砌,读之不知所云;在结论上不能为深化研究提供帮助;其二在观念上固步自封、排拒一切外来新知,在方法上以现成的经典结论解释丰富多彩的历史。这两种倾向的出现给史学工作者提出
In recent years, the editorial department of “Research in Modern History” attaches great importance to the commentary on the study of modern Chinese history, focusing academic reviews on such major issues as style of study and discipline construction so as to intensify the academic review. 1. Focus on major theoretical and methodological issues Since the 1980s, the influx of overseas historiography and other social science theories and methods into China has greatly broadened people’s horizons. At the same time, two kinds of tendencies are breeding: one is methodically unscrupulous, unscrupulously swallowed, the application of hard-wired theoretical methods and concepts, the expression of stamina on the writing style, the concept of piling up, unintelligible; in conclusion Can not help to deepen the study; the second is the concept of self-restraint, rejection of all new information, in the method of classical conclusion to explain the rich and colorful history. The emergence of these two tendencies to historians