论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨和分析个体化舒适护理在妇科腹腔镜手术患者中的应用方法以及应用效果。方法 102例妇科患者作为研究主体,按患者入院顺序分为甲组和乙组,每组51例。甲乙两组患者均进行常规护理,而甲组患者加用个体化舒适护理,对比甲乙两组患者的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、住院时间以及护理满意度。结果护理后,甲组患者SDS评分(35.57±5.84)分、SAS评分(36.05±7.08)分、VAS评分(2.47±1.75)分均低于乙组的(41.25±4.79)、(42.35±5.94)、(4.21±1.01)分,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。甲组患者的住院时间(6.86±2.16)d短于乙组的(12.85±2.69)d,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。甲组患者护理总满意度98.04%高于乙组的78.43%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论个体化舒适护理在妇科腹腔镜手术患者的应用效果确切,有效改善了患者的负面情绪和疼痛情况,缩短了患者的住院时间,且提高了患者的护理满意度,值得推广。
Objective To investigate and analyze the application of personalized comfort nursing in patients with gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Methods A total of 102 cases of gynecological patients were divided into group A and group B according to the order of admission, with 51 cases in each group. Patients in both A and B groups were given routine nursing care. Patients in A group were treated with individualized comfort nursing. The visual analogue scale (VAS), SAS (anxiety scale), depression self-rating scale (SDS) score, length of stay, and nursing satisfaction. Results After treatment, the score of SDS in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (35.57 ± 5.84), SAS score (36.05 ± 7.08) and VAS score (2.47 ± 1.75) (41.25 ± 4.79, 42.35 ± 5.94) , (4.21 ± 1.01) points, the differences were statistically significant (P <0.05). The length of hospital stay in group A (6.86 ± 2.16) d was shorter than that in group B (12.85 ± 2.69) d, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The total satisfaction of patients in group A was 98.04% higher than 78.43% in group B, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Individualized comfort nursing is effective in patients with gynecological laparoscopic surgery, which effectively improves the patients’ negative emotions and pains, shortens the hospitalization time and enhances patient satisfaction. It is worth promoting.