论文部分内容阅读
公民的人身权、人格权受到不法侵害时,可否提起精神损害赔偿请求,法律界争论了十几年。在相当长的时期内,极左的政法观念貌似尊重人格尊严而实际上否定尊严有价,进而否定精神损害赔偿制度的合理性。即使民法通则第101、120条明文规定了公民享有名誉权、公民的人格尊严受法律保护,禁止用侮辱、诽谤等方式损害公民名誉;名誉受侵害的,有权要求停止侵害,恢复名誉,消除影响,赔礼道歉,并可要求赔偿损失。然而,否定精神损害赔偿制度存在及存在价值的主张与实践仍然存在,即使今天,在中国的某些地区,一条生命的死亡赔偿还可能是几千或1万元。
Citizens' personal rights and personality rights are invariably infringed, can they bring a request for compensation for moral damages, and the legal profession has been arguing for more than a decade. For a long period of time, the ultra-left concept of politics and law appears to respect the dignity of the human person and in fact deny the price of dignity, thereby negating the rationality of the system of compensation for moral damages. Even though Articles 101 and 120 of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China expressly stipulate that citizens have the right of reputation, citizens' personal dignity shall be protected by law and no use of insults, defamation, etc. shall be prohibited. Anyone whose reputation is infringed shall have the right to request the cessation of infringement, the restoration of reputation, Influence, apologize, and may claim damages. However, there are still many claims and practices that negate the existence and existence value of the system of compensation for moral damages. Even in some areas of China, the compensation for the death of a person may be thousands or 10,000 yuan.