论文部分内容阅读
本文讨论的是一个在东亚的多层次、多样化的亚洲叙事,该叙事被认为是竹内好的谱系学。竹内好强调避免将亚洲实在化,以克服现代性,而正是现代性造成了许多问题,如二次世界大战、日本民族主义、帝国主义和殖民主义,他同时批判了京都学派的战前哲学。沟口雄三和陈光兴深化了竹内好关于历史研究方法论的观点。但他们没有从中发展出哲学的可能性。井筒俊彦,曾是竹内好的同事,但人们没有把他与竹内好联系起来,但是我们可以看到他们的相同兴趣:克
This article discusses a multi-level, diverse Asian narrative in East Asia that is considered to be a good pedigree in Takeshita. Takenaka emphasized the avoidance of realizing Asia in order to overcome modernity. It is precisely this modernity has caused many problems, such as World War II, Japanese nationalism, imperialism and colonialism. He also criticized the pre-war philosophy of the Kyoto school . Mizoguchi and Mitsuhiro Mizohashi deepen their good point about the methodology of historical research. But they do not have the possibility of developing philosophy from it. Junji Toshihiko, who was a good friend at Takeshita, did not associate him with Takenaka, but we can see their same interest: