论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析使用高频电波(LEEP)刀治疗与常规治疗慢性宫颈炎的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2011年11月至2013年12月收治入院并经临床探查与病理检查能够确诊的慢性宫颈炎患者196例,随机分为实验组100例和对照组96例。实验组患者采取LEEP刀治疗,对照组采用常规电烫治疗,9周后复查。观察比较两组患者的临床疗效和术后的临床表征(阴道排液量、排液时间、阴道出血量、出血时间)。结果实验组患者显效83例,有效17例;对照组显效64例,有效16例,无效8例。实验组总有效率为100%,对照组为83.3%,实验组治疗效果明显优于对照组(P<0.01);两组患者术后临床表征比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0.01)。结论使用LEEP刀治疗慢性宫颈炎的临床疗效显著,总有效率高,是一种高效安全的慢性宫颈炎治疗方法,值得在临床治疗中推广应用。
Objective To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of high-frequency radio wave (LEEP) knife treatment and routine treatment of chronic cervicitis. Methods A retrospective analysis of 196 cases of chronic cervicitis admitted to hospital from November 2011 to December 2013 and confirmed by clinical examination and pathological examination was divided into experimental group (100 cases) and control group (96 cases). The patients in the experimental group were treated with LEEP knife, while the control group were treated with conventional percutaneous radiotherapy and were examined after 9 weeks. Clinical efficacy and postoperative clinical manifestations (vaginal discharge, drainage time, vaginal bleeding, bleeding time) were observed and compared between the two groups. Results In the experimental group, 83 cases were markedly effective and 17 cases were effective. In the control group, 64 cases were markedly effective, 16 cases were effective and 8 cases were ineffective. The total effective rate was 100% in the experimental group and 83.3% in the control group. The therapeutic effect in the experimental group was significantly better than that in the control group (P <0.01). There was no significant difference in clinical manifestations between the two groups (P> 0.01). Conclusion The clinical curative effect of LEEP knife in the treatment of chronic cervicitis is significant and the total effective rate is high. It is a safe and effective treatment of chronic cervicitis and worthy of promotion and application in clinical treatment.