论文部分内容阅读
(接上期)原告律师有理、有据、有节的辩论,似乎揭开了两件珍贵文物归属之争的隐秘。2006年9月1日,正定县人民法院行政审判庭就本案做出一审判决:本案诉争的两件文物,被告石家庄市文物保护研究所确认为是出土文物并收缴国有的具体行政行为是在1983年11月,根据法律规定,行政机关做出具体行政行为时,没有做出或者没有送达法律文书,公民、法人或者其他组织不服可以向人民法院起诉,只要能证明具体行政行为存在,人民法院
(Continued) plaintiff lawyer rational, well-knit, section debates, seems to have opened the secret of the veil of two precious relics. On September 1, 2006, the Administrative Tribunal of Zhengding County People’s Court of First Instance handed down the verdict of the first instance in this case: the two cultural relics and defendants in this case were confirmed as Shijiazhuang Institute of Cultural Heritage Protection as unearthed cultural relics and collection of state-owned specific administrative acts at In November 1983, according to the law, when administrative agencies made concrete administrative acts, they did not make or did not serve legal documents. People, legal persons and other organizations could not sue the people’s courts if they could prove that specific administrative acts existed and that the people Court