论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析非本市户籍的新生儿听力复查率的相关因素,提出干预措施。方法:应用瞬态诱发性耳声发射(TEOAE)对出生新生儿进行听力筛查,初筛未通过者出院前再筛查一次,未通过者1个月或42天左右复查,仍未通过者于3月龄内转诊至儿童听力诊断中心进行听力学诊断和医学评估。结果:自2010年12月~2011年11月间上海市松江区中心医院出生新生儿接受听力筛查2 285例,其中非本市户籍新生儿2 060例。本市户籍新生儿两次院内初筛未通过27例,实际复查24例,复查率88.89%,未通过3例;非本市户籍新生儿院内初筛未通过322例,实际复查173例,复查率53.73%,未通过24例,未复查149例。非本市户籍的新生儿听力复查率明显低于本市户籍新生儿(P“,”Objective:To analyze the related factors of the second screening rate of non-resident neonatal hearing,and put forward interventional measures.Methods:Transient evoked otoacoustic emission(TEOAE) was used to conduct hearing screening among neonates at birth,the neonates failing in primary screening received the second screening before they left the hospital,if they failed again,they received screening at one month or 42 days after birth,the neonates failing for the second time were transferred to child hearing diagnostic center to received hearing diagnosis and medical evaluation at three months after birth.Results:From December 2010 to November 2011,2 285 neonates who were born in the hospital received neonatal hearing screening,including 2 060 non-resident neonates.Among resident neonates,27 neonates failed primary hearing screening twice in the hospital,24 neonates were reexamined,the second screening rate was 88.89%,three neonates failed;among the non-resident neonates,322 neonates failed primary hearing screening,173 neonates were reexamined,the second screening rate was 53.73%,24 neonates failed,and 149 neonates didn't receive the second screening.The second hearing rate screening among resident neonates was statistically significantly lower than that among non-resident neonates(P<0.001),the most important cause was loss to follow-up(31.54%).Conclusion:The second screening rate of neonatal hearing among non-resident neonates is low,and the follow-up is difficult;health education should be enhanced to strengthen cognition to neonatal hearing screening and improve second screening rate of neonatal hearing.