论文部分内容阅读
随着生态环境急剧恶化,生态危机与日俱增,对于生态文艺学的关注与研究也日益增多,甚至可以称为“爆炸式增长”。但是若以学科门类来比较的话,生态文艺学的发展还是略显滞后。本文即从学科之惑、理论之惑、思维之惑三个方面,浅析现代生态文艺学自身存在的不足与所面临的困难,以期探求生态文艺学更好的发展之路。一、学科之惑命名的争议:自生态文艺学诞生之日起,关于其命名的争议就从未停止。最为强烈的一个声音就是在不断追问“生态文艺学”和“文艺生态学”的区别。
With the rapid deterioration of the ecological environment and the ecological crisis, the concern and research on eco-literature and art has also been increasing. It can even be called “explosive growth.” However, if the comparison of disciplines, the development of eco-literary theory is still slightly lagging behind. In this paper, we analyze the shortcomings and difficulties faced by modern ecological literature and art in terms of the confusion of disciplines, the confusion of theories and the confusion of thinking in order to seek a better development path of ecological literature and art. First, the disciplinary confusion Naming controversy: Since the birth of eco-literary theory, the controversy about its naming has never stopped. One of the strongest voices is the constant questioning of the difference between “eco-literary studies” and “literary ecology”.