论文部分内容阅读
从皮尔斯(C.S.Peirce)提出像似符号的概念以来,已经过了很长时间。从那时起,我们越来越认识到符号系统在极大程度上建立在像似的一些类型上。但是我们越是看到类比表意扩展它的领域,就越是认识到一个物理对象跟第二个对象或一个精神实体的局部连接这种简单关系的概念是不充分的。换句话说,索绪尔(Ferdinand de Saussure)设想的符号理论更完善,但这个理论由于其本身的定义,关注一个受限的领域,绝对不会包括依赖类比联系的符号领域。这篇文章旨在展示索绪尔模式如何更完美地充当一个一般重述的起点,包括在类比基础上的符号。我们可以这样形容“新古典主义”:一种创新的符号学理论,能够在我们学科最重要的基础上连接最新的“社会符号学”研究。
It has been a long time since C.S. Peirce put forward the concept of symbolicity. Since then, we have come to realize more and more that symbolic systems are largely based on some likeness. But the more we see that the analogy expands its domain, the more the concept of a simple relation that recognizes the local connection of a physical object to a second object or a spiritual entity is inadequate. In other words, the symbolic theory envisioned by Ferdinand de Saussure is more complete, but due to its own definition, the theory focuses on a limited area and will never include the symbolic domain that depends on analogy. This article aims to show how Saussure’s model can serve as a perfect starting point for a general restatement, including symbols based on analogies. We can describe it as “neoclassical”: an innovative semiotic theory that connects the latest “sociodemographic” research to the most important of our disciplines.