论文部分内容阅读
制度史的研究,大致有两个路径。一是立足于制度本位,将制度作为具体的研究对象,对其演变、职掌、功能、利弊等展开梳理和阐释。二是将制度作为观察历史的切入点和窗口,以展现制度运行背后的政治实态,读史者借此把握时代脉动的意义,进而加深对总体历史的理解。成功的制度史研究,自然要求二者的有机结合。范学辉教授新著《宋代三衙管军制度研究》(中华书局,2015年),在系统扎实的“制度内”研究基础上,走向“制度外”历史的深入
The study of institutional history, there are roughly two paths. First, based on the system-based system, the system as a specific research object, its evolution, occupation, function, advantages and disadvantages, such as combing and interpretation. The second is to use the system as a starting point and window for the observation of history so as to demonstrate the political reality behind the operation of the system. The historical readers can grasp the significance of the pulse of the times and deepen their understanding of the overall history. The successful study of the history of the system naturally requires the organic combination of the two. Professor Fan Xuehui’s new book, “Research on the System of the Three Parallel Administrations of the Military in the Song Dynasty” (Zhonghua Book Company, 2015), went deep into the history of “outside the system” based on the systematic study of the “system”