论文部分内容阅读
以韩礼德系统功能语法中三个元语言功能之一即语篇功能为理论基础,对比分析了英语本族语者与中国学者英语学术论文中信息结构及其推进模式,从不同主位推进和信息流动在两个语料库中对比来看,中国学者与英语本族语学者使用情况基本相同,这说明中国学者比较英语学术论文的语言特点。然而,由于中国学者受汉语主位结构策略的运用和负迁移的影响,中国学者多采用放射型和阶梯型推进模式,而在聚合型和交叉型主位推进模式的使用上仍存在错误和不当。本研究旨通过对比分析英语本族语者与中国学者在学术论文中信息推进模式,为中国学者学术论文写作构建有效主/述位模式。
Based on the textual function, one of the three meta-linguistic functions in Halliday’s system functional grammar, this paper compares and analyzes the information structure and its advancing mode in the English academic papers of English native speakers and Chinese scholars, The comparison between the two corpora shows that the use of Chinese scholars and native English linguists is basically the same, which shows that Chinese scholars compare the linguistic features of English academic papers. However, due to the influence of the Chinese scholar structure and the negative transfer of Chinese syllabuses, Chinese scholars mostly adopt the radial and ladder-type modes of promotion. However, there are still some mistakes and misconducts in using the mode of the thematic and cross-type thematic promotion . The aim of this study is to establish an effective advocate / rheme model for the Chinese scholarly essay writing by comparing and analyzing the mode of information propulsion used by English native speakers and Chinese scholars in academic papers.