论文部分内容阅读
[胜]和[败]作为一对反义概念,有时却可以表达同义现象。文章从认知语言学的相关理论视角对[胜]和[败]的语义特征进行分析,研究发现:(1)[胜]具有明确的语义指向,而[败]的语义指向不明;(2)当[胜]和[败]与其他语词并置形成二元述谓结构时,其语义指向具有组合性,并按下列顺序排列:方向性语词>非完成性动词的语义指向>完成性动词固有语义指向>非时间关系词的语义指向>典型语义指向,而当作为一元述谓时,其语义指向为施事。
[Wins] and [defeat] as a pair of antisense concepts, but sometimes can express the phenomenon of alienation. The article analyzes the semantic features of [Sheng] and [Lost] from the perspective of the related theories of cognitive linguistics and finds that: (1) [Sheng] has a clear semantic orientation while the meaning of [Lost] ) When [wins] and [los] are juxtaposed with other words to form a binary predicate structure, the semantic directions are combined and arranged in the following order: directional words> semantic pointing of nonfinite verbs> complete verbs Intrinsic semantic point> Semantic point of non-time relational word is> typical semantic point, and when it is a unary statement, its semantic point is action.