论文部分内容阅读
六十和七十年代中城市研究的中心议题局限于城市作为消费活动、定居和地区发展动力的中心,新古典主义城市经济学者和马克思主义学者都强调城市作为(家庭和家庭生活的社会空间的中心地位,而把生产空间(作为生产和工作的地域)贬低到简单背景和外部附加的次要地位,因而未能抓住城市化问题的实质。分析中必须把生产空间置于社会空间之前。某些社会学者认为,后工业社会及其后工业城市已经出现,这也是没有根据的。当然,事务和服务的职能正在城市中迅速发展,大城市更甚,然而,在现代工业资本主义中,这些职能是与
The central topic of urban studies in the 1960s and 1970s was confined to the city as the center of consumption dynamics, settlement and regional development dynamics. Neoclassical urban economists and Marxist scholars emphasized that urbanity as a social space for family and family life Centering on production space (as a place of production and work) to a secondary background of simple background and external attachment, failing to seize the essence of the problem of urbanization, the analysis must put production space ahead of social space. Certain sociologists also believe that post-industrial societies and their post-industrial cities have emerged, and that there is no basis for them. Of course, the functions of affairs and services are rapidly developing in the cities and even in the big cities. However, in modern industrial capitalism, These functions are with