论文部分内容阅读
李牧同志在《党政论坛》1988年11期上发表的《现代政党执政方式比较》一文,对改革我党的执政方式提出了几条思路,这是一个十分有意义的论题。其中有一条思路是改革党的执政方式应该精简党的队伍,增强党的活力。文章列举了一些数字说明,党员队伍一方面有无限扩大的趋势,另一方面出党人数微乎其微。而这种状况对党自身发展十分有害,使得党员的标准大大降低,党的活力受到抑制。解决办法是南斯拉夫等国的方法:慎进大出。党的队伍建如何适应党的执政方式的改革,如何增强党的活力,是慎进大出还是慎进慎出,是着眼于减少党员的数量还是着眼于提高党员队伍的素质,这关系到党的建设方针,必须慎重考虑。本文就这个问题谈一点看法。我认为,党员队伍能否适应党的执政方式的改革,不能主要从数量上来考虑,而应主要从提高党员队伍的素质上来考虑。党员队伍的素质的
Comrade Li Mu’s article on “Comparison of the Ruling Styles of Modern Parties”, published in Issue 11, 1988, “Party and Government Forums” offers several ideas on how to reform our party’s governing style. This is a very significant topic. One of the ideas is that to reform the party’s ruling style should streamline the party’s ranks and enhance the party’s vitality. The article lists some figures, party members on the one hand there is an unlimited trend of expansion, on the other hand the number of outgoing members is minimal. This situation is very harmful to the development of the party itself, greatly reducing the standard of party members and restraining the vitality of the party. The solution is Yugoslavia and other countries: cautious. How to adapt the reform of the party’s ruling style, how to enhance the vitality of the party, whether the party’s team construction is prudent or prudent and prudent and prudent, whether it aims to reduce the number of party members or the party members’ The construction policy, must be carefully considered. This article talked about this issue. In my opinion, the ability of party members to adapt to the reform of the party’s governing style can not be mainly considered in terms of numbers, but should mainly be considered in terms of improving the quality of party members. The quality of party members