论文部分内容阅读
美国科学哲学家库恩在《科学革命的结构》一书中将科学的发展归结为研究范式的变化,范式规定了科学研究的眼光、思路与对象。如果从这一角度来观照文学释义问题,我们就不难发现文学释义也经历了不同范式的演变过程:古典他律释义性范式、现代自律释义范式、后现代自律与他律互补的释义范式。这一演变与文学创作范式的嬗变大体同步,是文体创作范式的变化在文学释义领域的折射。
Kuhn, the American philosopher of science, attributed the development of science to the change of research paradigm in the book “The Structure of Scientific Revolution”, and the paradigm stipulates the vision, ideas and objects of scientific research. If we look at the problem of literary interpretation from this perspective, we can easily find that the interpretation of literature also goes through the process of evolution of different paradigms: the paradigm of classical henry interpretation, the paradigm of modern self-discipline and the paradigm of postmodern self-discipline and complementarity. This evolution is in synch with the transmutation of literary creation paradigm, which is the reflection of the change of stylistic creation paradigm in the field of literary interpretation.