论文部分内容阅读
加拿大渥太华大学管理系教授约翰·德拉莫特和保罗·杜夫最近在《自然》周刊发表了一篇以“科学政策是否已陷于萎靡不振状态?”为题的评论文章,对世界发达国家的科学政策状态进行了评论。 文章首先指出,整个经合组织(OECD)的决策者目前都面临严重的困境。一方面,科学、技术与革新明显地受到青睐,一般地说它们都被看作是获取国家优势的最重要手段因而得到OECD各国政府的大力支持——每年获得的资助约达1500亿美元,并成为各国的主流活动;但另一方面,由于失去智力激励和强有力的政治支持,国家的主要科学政策——包括政府计划以及支持科学、技术与革新的各种政策
John DeMarmott and Paul Duff, professors of management at the University of Ottawa, Canada, recently published a commentary in Nature magazine about the question of whether science policy has fallen into a doldrums? Policy status was commented. The article first points out that policymakers across the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) are currently facing serious difficulties. On the one hand, science, technology and innovation are obviously favored. Generally speaking, they are regarded as the most important means of obtaining national superiority and are therefore greatly supported by the governments of OECD countries. They receive about 150 billion U.S. dollars a year and Become a mainstream activity in all countries; on the other hand, due to the loss of intellectual incentives and strong political support, the country's major science policies - including government programs and various policies that support science, technology and innovation