论文部分内容阅读
核心期刊在学术研究中的评价作用,是由于它本身的特点和中国学界的实际情况决定的,但它也存在着许多功能误区:核心期刊本身的权威性不足;核心期刊所载论文只是研究学术信息的密度和流向,与论文的学术水平和创造性标准有一定出入;科研单位和科研管理部门对核心期刊的误用。学界以核心期刊作为论文评价的标准会产生许多不良影响。专家应该是学术研究水平评价中的主体。专家评价应以参考同类期刊领先、认定需要、导向公正、学科级差合并和期刊内分级等为原则。
The core journals in the evaluation of academic research, because of its own characteristics and the actual situation of Chinese academia, but it also has many functional errors: the core journals itself is not authoritative; papers published in the core journals is only the study of academic The density and direction of information have certain discrepancy with the academic standards and creative standards of the essay. The research institutes and research administrations misuse the core journals. The academic journals with core journals as the standard of essay evaluation will have many adverse effects. Experts should be the main body in the evaluation of academic research. Expert evaluation should be based on the principle of taking the lead of similar journals, identifying the need, guiding the fairness, consolidating disciplines and grading journals.