论文部分内容阅读
传统修辞学运用归纳法,在已有用例的基础上归纳出各种修辞格来,这便是归纳的辞格。这种归纳的辞格是历史地逐步地形成的,内部必然有交叉现象,往往难以运用形式逻辑方法来进行分类。王希杰在《论归纳的辞格和演绎的辞格》(载《池州师专学报》93年第1期)一文中,试图建立两种辞格系统,即归纳的辞格和演绎的辞格。演绎的辞格是辞格中不强调在语言运用中已经形成的固定格式,而是可能的——这包括了已经形成和将来会形成的,以及理论上应当形成,但事实上似平不可能形成的——一种偏离格式。根据这种认识,他对归纳的辞格和演绎的辞格分别下了广义和狭义两种不同的定义。归纳辞格的广义定义是:“修辞格是一种语言
The traditional rhetoric uses inductive method, induces various rhetorical forms on the basis of the existing use cases, which is the concluding remarks. This kind of inductive rhetoric is formed gradually and historically. There must be intercross phenomena in the interior, and it is often difficult to categorize it by formal logic. In his article ”On the Figures of Speech and Deduction of Inductive Induction“ (No. 1, 93, No. 1, Chizhou Teachers’ College), Wang Xijie attempted to establish two kinds of figures of speech systems, that is, concise and deductive figures of speech. The figure of speech in deduction is a fixed format that is not emphasized in rhetoric that has been formed in the use of language. It is possible - this includes what has been and will be formed in the future and should theoretically be formed, but in fact it seems impossible Formed - a deviation from the format. According to this understanding, he made two general definitions and narrow definitions respectively on the figures of speech and the figures of speech. The general definition of inductive figures of speech: ”figure of speech is a language