论文部分内容阅读
《苏共历史问题》1988年第2期刊载了以“70年社会发展的若干问题。阻碍机制的作用”为主题的讨论会的综述。参加会议的学者中有哲学博士A·布坚科教授。他在发言中阐述了列宁逝世后苏维埃国家发展的过程,指出斯大林及其周围的人们以及他所建立的官僚主义机构向工人阶级和集体农庄农民“篡夺政权”的事实。其他人(B·利皮茨基、Ю·阿克肖诺夫等)在发言中指出,对30—50年代初苏联杜会的社会结构所作的具体历史分析没有证实布坚科的这个假设。他们强调说,斯大林的个人权力政体尽管有种种弊端,颠倒黑白,指鹿为马,进行了大规模毫无根据的镇压,与社会主义格格不入,但并不能改变苏联社会政治制度的本性和本质以及苏维埃政权的阶级实质。布坚科不同意论敌们的理由,给杂志编辑部写了一封信。编辑部刊载此信,并认为,布坚科提出的与我国社会主义建设有关的若干尖锐问题,需要进行深入的科学研究。
“History of the CPSU” No. 2, 1988 presents an overview of seminars on the theme “Several issues of 70 years of social development and the role of impeding mechanisms”. Among the scholars attending the conference were Professor A. Bu Jianke, a PhD. In his speech, he elaborated the process of the development of the Soviet state after the death of Lenin and pointed out the fact that Stalin and people around him and the bureaucratic structures he established “usurped power” by the working class and collective farmer peasants. Others (B. Lipitsky, Ю Akshonov, etc.) pointed out in their speech that the specific historical analysis of the social fabric of the Soviet Union in the early 30s-50s did not confirm Budenko's assumption. They emphasized that Stalin's personal power regime, despite all its drawbacks and reverses of black and white, refers to deer as a belligerent, conducted a massive and baseless repression that is incompatible with socialism but does not change the nature and essence of the political system of the Soviet society and the Soviet political power Class essence. Bukenko disagreed with the enemy's reasons and wrote a letter to the magazine's editorial board. The editorial department has published this letter and believes that Bujian Branch's certain sharp issues related to the socialist construction in our country require in-depth scientific research.