论文部分内容阅读
目的:探究细菌性肺炎诊断时,使用C反应蛋白(CRP)、血常规的诊断价值。方法:针对40例细菌性肺炎患者使用C反应蛋白(CRP)、血常规检验,并归为观察组,针对另外40例健康体检者实施同样检查,并归为观察组,两组患者均为我院2015年6月到2017年1月间收治。结果:观察组患者的相关检测结果和对照组比较均存在差异,说明通过C反应蛋白(CRP)、血常规检测均能够发现患者机体异常情况,CRP检验阳性率为87.5%,血常规检验阳性率为65.0%,比较两组阳性率P<0.05则说明差异明显,说明CRP用于细菌性肺炎检验更加准确。结论:C反应蛋白(CRP)、血常规用于诊断细菌性肺炎价值分析发现,其均能够反映出患者的疾病情况,但是C反应蛋白(CRP)对于疾病的检出率更高,因此更加具有临床使用价值,值得借鉴。
Objective: To investigate the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia, the use of C-reactive protein (CRP), blood routine diagnostic value. Methods: 40 cases of bacterial pneumonia patients using C-reactive protein (CRP), blood tests, and classified as observation group, for the other 40 cases of healthy subjects to implement the same test, and classified as observation group, both groups of patients were me Hospital from June 2015 to January 2017 were admitted. Results: There were significant differences between the observation group and control group in the observation group, which showed that the abnormalities of the patients were found by C-reactive protein (CRP) and blood test, the positive rate of CRP was 87.5%, the positive rate of blood test Was 65.0%. The comparison of the positive rates of both groups showed P <0.05, indicating that the difference was significant, indicating that CRP is more accurate for bacterial pneumonia test. CONCLUSIONS: The value of C-reactive protein (CRP) and blood routine in the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia shows that all of them can reflect the patient’s disease status, but the detection rate of C-reactive protein (CRP) is higher and therefore more Clinical value, it is worth learning.