论文部分内容阅读
犯罪构成符合性判断包括涵摄和等置两种不尽相同的思维模式。在犯罪构成要件含义明确的案件中,凭借经验就可以判断出事实要件是否符合对应的构成要件,这是涵摄的思维模式;但在构成要件含义不明确的案件中,必须通过比较事实要件与构成要件的典型事实是否具有法律意义的同一性来判断事实要件是否符合对应的构成要件,这是等置的思维模式。
The criminal judgment of conformity includes two different modes of thinking, such as culvert and waiting. In the criminal cases, the meaning of the elements of the crime is clear, by virtue of experience we can judge whether the elements of the facts meet the corresponding elements of the constitution. This is the mode of thinking of the filming. However, in cases where the meaning of the elements is not clear, Whether the typical facts constituting the elements have the legal significance to judge whether the factual elements conform to the corresponding constitutional elements is an equal mode of thinking.