论文部分内容阅读
对于浅草社和沉钟社的关系,向来存在着两种不同意见。一种意见以茅盾、鲁迅为代表,认为二者是前后相续的一个社团。茅盾在《<中国新文学大系·小说一集>导言》里说:“浅草社除已出版《浅草季刊》及《文艺旬刊》外,在十四年春又改出了《沉钟》周刊。”鲁迅在《<中国新文学大系>小说二集序》里也说浅草社自中枢移入北京后,“社员好像走散了一些,《浅草》季刊改为篇叶较少的《沉钟》周刊了”。此后,许多权威的文学史一般也持此说。如唐弢主编的《中国现代文学史》径称其为“浅草——沉钟社”。而该社同仁林如稷也认为沉钟社由浅草社改成,两社实际上是一个社团。他说:“一九二五年我们浅草社走散了一些人,又新加入了杨晦、蔡仪几位,改为沉钟社,在北京出版《沉钟》周刊。”
There are always two different opinions about the relationship between Asakusa and Shen Chung She. One kind of opinion is represented by Mao Dun and Lu Xun, and they are both considered as a community that precedes and succeeds. Mao Dun said in his introduction to “A Collection of Chinese New Literature Major Fiction” that Asakusa Society has changed its weekly magazine Shen Zhong in the fourteenth spring of the year except for the publication of Asakusa Quarterly and Literary Tenantry. “Lu Xun also said in” The Second Book of Novels of Chinese New Literature Series “that Asakusa Society has moved from Beijing to Beijing.” The members seem to have separated some, and the “Asakusa” quarterly magazine has been replaced by the “Shen Chung” Weekly “. Since then, many authoritative literary history generally said this. For example, ”History of Modern Chinese Literature“ edited by Tang Tao calls it ”Asakusa - Shen Zhong Society.“ However, Lin Ruji, a colleague of the same company, also believed that Shen Zhongshe was changed from Asakusa to a society of two associations in fact. He said: ”In 1925, some of our people in Asakusa dividied. They added a few members of Yang Hui and Cai Yi to Shen Zhongshe and published the magazine Shen Zhong in Beijing.