“圈阅”利弊略考

• 作 者: 叶小文
• 出 处: 山花
• 发表日期: 2004年期
• 关键词: 《四书集注》 刘辰翁 宋代朱熹 文学评论家 科举时代 下加 个人负责 象科 下回分解 拖拖沓沓

“圈阅”的本意,是圈点文章以便阅读。我国古籍向来没有断句。加以圈点,就如唱戏有了“板眼”,轻重缓急,抑扬顿挫,可以琅琅上口。据考,宋代朱熹的《四书集注》,首创在每章之前加一大“○”,每句下加旁圈。元末的刘辰翁又来了点突破,把对前人著作的圈点(他自称“批点”)作为文学评论家行褒贬的手段。这一类“圈阅”法,本也有利无弊,到科举时代却大谬不然了。那

The purpose of “circle reading” is to circle the article for reading. Ancient Chinese literature has never been sentenced. To be punctuated, as singing a “board eye”, priority, cadence, you can catchy. According to the test, the Song Dynasty Zhu Xi's “Four Notes”, first in front of each chapter plus a large “○”, add a paraphrase under each sentence. At the end of the Yuan Dynasty, Liu Chen-weng came again to make a breakthrough and put the punctuation of his predecessors (he calls himself “criticizing”) as a means of complimenting and criticizing literary critics. This kind of “circle reading” law, this is also beneficial without any problems, to the imperial civil exam era is absurd. that