论文部分内容阅读
二十世纪上半叶的藏族社会经济关系问题不止一次地引起了俄苏的,以及外国研究者的注意。外国作者,通常并不对西藏社会的阶级结构进行分析,而代之以对复杂的官位等级制、显贵和平民生活的推论或者是去探求所谓的社会阶层问题。他们所得出的结论掩盖了西藏封建社会的阶级性,自然也不能提出阶级斗争是社会发展的动力的问题。遗憾的是,西藏的孤立状态导致了对西藏历史——民族方面的研究非常薄弱,在前半个世纪里仅仅只有个别的旅行者到过这个地区,告诉了世人他们所看到的一切。缺乏足够的资料就预先注定了我们是不可能非常科学地研究我们所探讨的这一课题的。
The issue of Tibetan socio-economic relations in the first half of the twentieth century attracted more than once the attention of Russian and Soviet scholars and foreign researchers. Foreign authors usually do not analyze the class structure of Tibetan society and replace it with the corollary of complicated bureaucratic hierarchies, dignitaries and civilian lives, or the so-called social stratification. The conclusions they reached obscured the class nature of the feudal society in Tibet and naturally did not suggest that class struggle was the driving force of social development. Regrettably, Tibet’s isolation has led to very weak history and ethnic studies in Tibet. In the first half of the century, only a few travelers traveled to this area and told the world what they saw. It is not possible to study the subject we are exploring very scientifically in the absence of sufficient information to predetermine us.