论文部分内容阅读
在甲骨学领域中,《合集》3410“白羌”一词一直是个争议的焦点,因为对此词的识读正确与否,牵涉商代印欧人种是否曾生活于中国内地的重大问题。历来学者多认为此词是商王贞问白种羌女是否生育白皮肤后代的确证,然而最近学者透过缀合,将此版龟腹甲与《合集》11051重新合并,得出新的卜辞,显示其内容实与白羌无关,而事实上属于对马匹生育后代的贞问。本文对其进行了探讨,并同时针对此类马匹的名称问题,以及甲骨文中到底是否存在关于白种人的卜问,分别做了相关研究。
In the field of oracle boneology, the term “collection” of 3410 “Baiqiang ” has always been the subject of controversy because the correct interpretation of this term involves the importance of Indo-European ethnic origin in the Shang Dynasty problem. Historically, many scholars think that this term is a confirmation by Shang Wangzhen about whether or not white Qiang women have white-skinned offspring. However, recently, scholars have re-merged this version of 1101 with the “collection” 11051 to create a new inscription Its content is really nothing to do with Bai Qiang, but in fact belongs to the virginity of the offspring of horses. This article explores it, and at the same time, it deals with the issue of the name of this kind of horse and the question whether there are any white people in Oracle.