论文部分内容阅读
新规则对比赛成绩的计算方法做了修改,与旧的计算方法相比,哪种更准确、更科学,难有定论。比赛成绩需要一个统一的、基本合理的计算方法来辨清胜负,排出先后。新、旧两种计算方法都能达到这一目的。但旧的计算法较繁琐,而新的计算方法则简明、快捷。而且新的计算方法对球队提出了更高的要求。因为你要取得最后的胜利,不仅每场比赛要立足于赢,而且还要多得分。否则,最后计算成绩时就会吃亏。这样有利于克服打“假球”或“相互礼让”现象。为了找出新旧计算方法的不同, 我将已往30次比赛的成绩按新的方法计算后进行了对比,其中有19次名次排列完全吻合,占63.33%;有11次
The new rules have changed the calculation of competition results, which is more accurate, scientific and difficult to determine than the old one. Competition results need a unified, basic and reasonable calculation method to identify the outcome, discharge successively. New and old two kinds of calculation methods can achieve this goal. However, the old calculation method is cumbersome, while the new calculation method is concise and fast. And the new calculation method put forward higher requirements to the team. Because you want to get the final victory, not only should each game be based on win, but also scoring more. Otherwise, the final calculation results will suffer. This will help overcome the phenomenon of playing “match-fixing” or “mutual restraint.” In order to find out the difference between the old and the new calculation methods, I compared the results of the previous 30 competitions according to the new method. Among them, 19 ranking matches completely, accounting for 63.33%; 11 times