论文部分内容阅读
Courts will be allowed to accept information culled from suspects’ social media postings as evidence in criminal cases as of Oct. 1， according to a broader definition of digital evidence issued on Wednesday.
Guidelines issued by the Ministry of Public Security， the Supreme People’s Court and the top prosecutor’s office， the Supreme People’s Procuratorate， also allow police to sift through suspects’ social media archives on platforms such as WeChat after obtaining a court order.
It has authorized law enforcement agencies to access information stored on corporate computer servers to assist criminal investigations.
Courts already accept certain forms of digital evidence such as screen grabs of web pages and mobile text messages as valid evidence in criminal trials.
Police and courts have had difficulties convincing individuals and tech firms to hand over their devices or servers to aid investigations due to privacy concerns， said Liu Pinxin， an associate law professor at Renmin University in Beijing.
The new rules require at least two law enforcement officials to work together when combing through social media archives and retrieving digital evidence to ensure its authenticity. The guidelines also say individuals’ right to privacy should be protected， but it did not spell out any punishments for breaches of privacy that law enforcement officials commit during an investigation.
A global debate over balancing the need to protect privacy without hindering the efforts of law enforcement agencies was triggered after Apple Inc. got into a legal tussle with the FBI earlier this year after the iPhone maker refused to help authorities unlock the smartphone used by a shooter in the San Bernardino， California， attack in December. The issue was resolved after U.S. authorities said they had unlocked the device with the help of an unidentified third party.
Guidelines issued by the Ministry of Public Security， the Supreme People’s Court and the top prosecutor’s office， the Supreme People’s Procuratorate， also allow police to sift through suspects’ social media archives on platforms such as WeChat after obtaining a court order.
It has authorized law enforcement agencies to access information stored on corporate computer servers to assist criminal investigations.
Courts already accept certain forms of digital evidence such as screen grabs of web pages and mobile text messages as valid evidence in criminal trials.
Police and courts have had difficulties convincing individuals and tech firms to hand over their devices or servers to aid investigations due to privacy concerns， said Liu Pinxin， an associate law professor at Renmin University in Beijing.
The new rules require at least two law enforcement officials to work together when combing through social media archives and retrieving digital evidence to ensure its authenticity. The guidelines also say individuals’ right to privacy should be protected， but it did not spell out any punishments for breaches of privacy that law enforcement officials commit during an investigation.
A global debate over balancing the need to protect privacy without hindering the efforts of law enforcement agencies was triggered after Apple Inc. got into a legal tussle with the FBI earlier this year after the iPhone maker refused to help authorities unlock the smartphone used by a shooter in the San Bernardino， California， attack in December. The issue was resolved after U.S. authorities said they had unlocked the device with the help of an unidentified third party.