论文部分内容阅读
《武汉大学学报》,1994年第一期发表曾之的《套版印刷起源考》一文.指出,目前有三种说法:一是辽代说,二是元代说,三是明末说.其实,套印的产生自应有其学术基础和技术基础.从这两方面考证,套印始于元代,成于明末.著作方式的多样化、评点的盛行是套印产生的学术基础.直到北宋,儒家经典仍是本经和注疏各自单行,到了南宋,为阅读方便,遂将本经与注疏合在一起,另外南宋还出现一种新的著作方式——评点.合刻经注和评点均需要在印刷时把正文与批点区分开来,而从唐代发明雕版印刷以来,用同一墨色印刷不同内容有诸多不便,于是套版印刷就被提上日程.
“Journal of Wuhan University”, published in the first issue of 1994, “Origin of Set-printing” a text that pointed out that there are three kinds of argument: First, Liao said that the second is the Yuan Dynasty said that the third is the Ming said. , Overprinting comes from its academic and technical basis.From these two aspects of research, overprinting began in the Yuan Dynasty, into the late Ming Dynasty.Diversification of the way of writing, the prevalence of comment is the academic foundation of overprinting.Through the Northern Song Dynasty, The Confucian classics are still separate from each other in the Book of Songs and the Annotation of the Book of Songs. When it came to the Southern Song Dynasty, for the convenience of reading, the Confucian classics were grouped together. In addition, a new style of writing appeared in the Southern Song Dynasty When printing, the text and the spot are distinguished. Since the invention of the engraving printing in the Tang Dynasty, there have been many inconveniences in printing the different contents in the same ink color. Thus, the full-page printing was put on the agenda.