论文部分内容阅读
揭开中国传统法文化的帷幕,可以看到道义论作为法的理论基石,被奉为经世圭桌,与之相对立的,由墨翟首创的法的功利观,却也留下了一定的踪迹。无独有偶,十八世纪的西方掀起了边沁的法的功利观的高潮。从现在的时空高度看,中西法的功利观或交叉或相向运行着。交叉运行表现在它们都有深厚且相同的哲学基础——人性论,又都从法理学和部门法的角度阐述法的功利观;相向运行则表现在由于它们各自所处的文化背景的迥然,也存在深层的差异。一、合理内核——人性论中国古代的墨翟、韩非和西方近代的边沁部首先从人性入手,寻觅到了法的功利观
Uncovering the curtain of China’s traditional legal culture, one can see that the theory of morality is the cornerstone of the theory of law, the antithesis of the principle of justice pioneered by Mo Zhai, The trail. Coincidentally, the Western eighteenth century set off the climax of Bentham’s utilitarianism. Judging from the current height of space and time, the utilitarian concept of both China and the West runs alternately or oppositely. Cross-running is manifested in that both of them have a profound and identical philosophical basis - the theory of human nature, both of them discuss the utilitarian concept of law from the perspectives of jurisprudence and departmental law. Oppositely behave because of their disparate cultural backgrounds, There are deep differences. First, a reasonable core - the theory of human nature Ancient China’s Mo Zhai, Han Fei and Western modern Bentham Department first start from the human nature, to find the utilitarian concept of law