论文部分内容阅读
本文通过对英国功能学派“史前史”的考察,再联系发生在中国的一些田野调查实践,对“马凌诺斯基革命”进行了重新思考。文章指出:田野调查早已有之,不能将“田野调查革命”和田野调查的起源混为一谈;后来被归功于“马凌诺斯基革命”的许多东西在1922年之前已有表述,我们在承认马凌诺斯基贡献的同时,也应注意到他承袭了前人的许多遗产;人类学民族志田野工作并非生来便是马凌诺斯基式的,它原本可以有别的样态;现代民族志和功能主义的联合并非逻辑意义上的唯一可能性。
This essay reconsider “Marinowski Revolution ” through the investigation of the British Functionalist School “Prehistoric ” and contact with some field investigation and practice in China. The article points out that the field investigation has already existed and the “field research revolution” can not be confused with the origin of the field investigation; many things that were later attributed to “Mariannochky Revolution” have been expressed by 1922, and we While acknowledging the contribution of Marinowski, it should also be noted that he inherited many of his predecessors’ heritage; the Anthropological Ethnographic Fieldwork was not born to be the Mariannowski-style, it could have been otherwise The combination of modern ethnography and functionalism is not the only logical possibility.