论文部分内容阅读
福建周宁县公安局副局长陈长春强奸少女又妨碍作证,周宁县法院由多数不熟悉刑法者组成的委员会作出有期徒刑3年的裁判。经媒体报道和检察院抗诉,宁德市中级法院终审判其有期徒刑12年。两级法院判决的悬殊,再次突现我国现行的审判委员会制度的弊端审判委员会作为法院内部最高层次的审判组织,它负责讨论决定重大、疑难案件,有权决定本院所受理的一切案件的判决结果。其初衷是好的,但弊端也显而易见,集中在:审者不判,判者不审,违背了审判的亲历性原则;名为集体负责,实为谁也不
Chen Changchun, deputy director of the Fujian Zhouning County Public Security Bureau raped the girl and hindered the testimony of Zhou Ning County court by the majority of not familiar with the criminal law committee composed of three years in prison. After media reports and prosecutors protest, Ningde Intermediate People’s Court finally sentenced him to 12 years imprisonment. Disparity between the two court decisions, once again highlight the drawbacks of our current system of trial committee As the highest level within the court trial committee, which is responsible for the discussion of major and difficult cases, the power to decide the Court accepted the outcome of all the judgments . The original intention is good, but the drawbacks are obvious, focused on: the trial is not sentenced, the judge does not trial, contrary to the principle of trial of the pro-calendar; called collective responsibility, in fact, who is not