反思与本文解释

• 作 者: 孔明安
• 机 构: 中国社会科学院哲学研究所
• 出 处: 中国社会科学院研究生院学报
• 发表日期: 1992年05期
• 关键词: 利科 解释学 普遍有效性 伽达默尔 概念区别 哲学反思 胡塞尔现象学 “象征” 精神现象学 先天综合判断

本文在阐明利科反思概念与传统哲学反思概念区别的基础上,探讨了利科反思概念在其解释学中的地位,指出利科的解释哲学就是反思哲学.文章还说明了利科一开始曾以含有字面与隐含双重意义的“象征”作为其解释学的对象,但这样会导致“解释的冲突”,所以,利科后来以本文作为其解释学的对象.利科的本文解释理论既摆脱了伽达默尔的语言中心主义,又不同于德里达主张的非中心论,转到了“本文中心”.但利科解释学仍然面临着理解的普遍有效性问题.

On the basis of clarifying the difference between the concepts of Ricoeurian reflection and traditional philosophical reflection, this article discusses the position of Ricoeurian reflection in her hermeneutics, and points out that Ricoeur’s interpretive philosophy is reflective philosophy, Therefore, Ricoeur later takes this article as the object of hermeneutics.Like’s theory of interpreting the texts is not only a symbol of hermeneutics, but also a “symbol of hermeneutics” Getting rid of Gadamer’s linguistic centrism and different from Derrida’s claim to non-centralism, it turned to the “center of this article.” However, there is still universality and validity of Lectér’s interpretation in understanding.